Wednesday, 30 September 2015

SIFar uncovers the Emotional Media behind JustMean


JustMean & Emotional Media

The Story, the reality, the fabricated reality and the spoof. You may call it any of these, but this would not go unnoticed, this can not be ignored.
 
Team SIFar comes together to put in place the reality of the cartel of Social Media and Electronic Media. Brings up the classic case of how real the old saying is "riding the wave".
 
Few months back, Delhi streets had an innocent man branded as a 'pervert' going around on his bike. The man, was branded a pervert just not by a complainant but also by one the biggest media houses, which doesn't seem to learn the way their Court Rooms (and not Studios) have fined them.
 
Just take a minute to read this news which I am sure you would agree is a very justified penalization.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Times-Now-to-deposit-Rs-100-crore-before-HC-takes-up-its-appeal-in-defamation-case/articleshow/10734614.cms?prtpage=1


Team SIFar comes together for a short reality of the celebrated braveheart-pervert case.
 
Enjoy this reality and DO NOT FORGET, IF YOU ARE A MAN, YOU ARE IN DANGER AND IF YOU ARE A WOMAN, YOUR FATHER/BROTHER/HUSBAND/FRIEND ARE IN DANGER.
 
 

Thursday, 24 September 2015

SEMINAR - MATRIX of MISANDRY (4th Oct 2015, Delhi)

MATRIX OF MISANDRY


 
When, Morpheus asked Neo in the mind boggling movie, THE MATRIX, if he wanted to have the RED Pill or the BLUE Pill, neither of them knew that in India, such choice is never given to a new born.
 
 
A Child born in India, is never asked if he/she wants to take the Red Pill or the Blue Pill. As per Wikipedia,
"The red pill and its opposite, the blue pill, are popular culture symbols representing the choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue pill). Redpills are people who have chosen to face reality, while bluepills remain living in ignorance of the truth, whether by choice or because they have not had a choice."
 
NOW, THE TIME HAS COME.
 
Save Family Foundation (Regd. NGO), in collaboration with Hridaya - A Nest of Family Harmony & National Litigant Bench, announces the session where all Mr. Andersons would be rediscovered as Neos. And to make Neos smarter, NLB gives the sweet treat of "HOW TO BE A SMART LITIGANT".

 
 
With the advancements of Medical Sciences, virtually, every anomaly in Human body is discoverable and most of these are done via simple blood tests.
 
But let us ask a simple question, IS THAT ONLY WATER/WBC/RBC/HEMOGLOBIN etc. running in our Blood?
NO
 
What runs in our blood is deeply ingrained Feminism, deeply ingrained Male Hatred and deeply ingrained MISANDRY.
 
Thus, for the awakening, for the revelation, these Men's Rights Organizations working for Family Harmony, under the aegis of Save Indian Family Movement (SIF), invite you to the Seminar:
 
"MATRIX of MISANDRY"
 
Date: 4th October 2015 (Sunday)
Venue: Jawaharlal Nehru Youth Center, beside Gandhi Peace Foundation, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, Delhi (nearest Metro Station is ITO - Violet Line)
Time: 9:30AM to 4:00PM
 
For more details, pleas call SIF One Helpline on 8882498498.
 
Like always, there are NO CHARGES / ENTRY FEE for the Seminar.
 
All are invited.
 
Updates about the event will be done on it's Facebook Event Page.
 
Lets WAKE UP!!
Banner of the Event

Poster of the Event




 
 

Tuesday, 15 September 2015

SFF submits Memorandum to Hon'ble Home Minister of India

SFF SUBMITS MEMO TO SHRI RAJNATH SINGH

 
Save Family Foundation (Regd. NGO, Delhi), a part of Save Indian Family (SIF) Movement, met with Shri Rajnath Singh, Hon'ble Home Minister of India in Delhi recently.
 
The team, accompanied by SIF Indore, submitted the below memorandum to him and had a brief discussion with the Hon'ble Minister.
 
Shri Rajnath Ji was very gentle and courteous in listening to us and read our Memorandum and their very focussed staff too went through the memo in great detail.
 
SIF will continue it's endeavour to appraise various authorities and public about the Pain of Men and to keep reminding them that #MenAreHumanToo & #CrimeHasNoGender.
 
 
 
 
COPY OF THE MEMO:
 
 
 

Friday, 4 September 2015

Frequently Asked Questions - Updated July 2015

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION

updated on July 2015
 
 
Save Indian Family counsellors have worked on few basics based on the experience and latest updates. Most of the initial questions are answered and have been covered widely.
 
PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE ADVISES ARE ON CASE TO CASE BASIS AND HENCE THIS VIDEO MUST NOT BE TAKEN AS 100% APPLICABLE. THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS AND THERE WILL ALWAYS BE EXCEPTIONS.
 
Please join SIF Yahoogroup, download SIF One App (for android phones), join our Weekly Meetings, Contact us via our website or even better, call us on SIF One - 8882498498 (India).
 


Friday, 21 August 2015

Parawise reply to DELHI CHARTER OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS BILL, 2015.

PARAWISE REPLY TO DELHI CHARTER OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS BILL, 2015

In the era when various courts including the Hon'ble Supreme Court has talked about the gamut of misuse of Gender based (biased) laws, the Delhi Government, known for its target of vote bank appeasement, has proposed Delhi Charter of Women's Rights Bill 2015.
 
The Government has completely ignore Men and Mal vote bank and it is really sad to see the proposal as that makes me question myself, I AM A MAN AND NOT EVEN EXISTING FOR GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI?
 
Today, group of Mumbai University 'FEMALE' students unwrapped what Public Opinion is really saying. So, Dear Politicians, ignoring men is like playing with emotions of Male Vote Bank (and female too as the survey report had 997 female respondents out of 2000 total surveyed).
 
Source: http://www.mid-day.com/articles/men-too-are-victims-of-sexism-find-girls-who-carried-out-survey-in-mumbai/16472159
 

Thursday, 20 August 2015

SIF passes Resolution in Mumbai 7th National Meet

 
Dear Friends,
 
Vaastav Foundation organized, another grand, National Meet from 14-16th August 2015 in Mumbai.
Meet was attended by over 180 activists and thinkers of Men's & Family Rights from across India. Over 30 like minded NGOs participated.
 
In this amazing brainstorming National Meet, these activists "in one voice" passed 8 points resolution.
 
The resolution, which was passed in now uploaded to SIF website and can be shared across all your contacts.
 
Copy of the Resolution passed by 180 Activists in Mumbai on 16th August 2015

Tuesday, 4 August 2015

SIF announces 7th National Meet - organized by Vaastav.org

7th NATIONAL MEET for MEN's RIGHTS

Vaastav Foundation, the NGO spearheading the Men's Rights Activities in Western India is organizing the 7th National meet for Men's Rights under Save Indian Family Banner. Details of the meet can be found here.
 
SIF hereby issues the Press Release for the meet and the dire need of Ministry of Men, in absence of which, Laws-Society-Courts-System are all turning Anti Male.
 

Page 1


Page 2

 
 

Page 3



Sunday, 3 May 2015

Marital Rape in India - Gandhari Society

GANDHARI SOCIETY – MARITAL RAPE

While we turn pages of our world known epics like Ramayana, we would read about a time when Lord Ram was able to raise Lord Shiva’s bow ‘गांडीव’ and broke it. This was required as per the want of the challenge. This made, most ardent follower of Lord Shiva, Lord Parashuram very angry. Lord Ram’s younger brother, Prince Lakshman, then requested Lord Parashuram to ignore what has happened and believe that his eyes are closed and hence nothing has happened. Lakshman said, “मूंदे आँख कत्हू कछु नाहि”.

Another world known epic, Mahabharata, depicts the mother or Kaurava’s, Gandhari, who pledged to remain blind folded to show solidarity with her blind Husband, Lord Dhritrashtra. The symbolic of being blind-folded was also to depict that knowingly, she closed her eyes to all wrong that her pedigree was doing.

Both these Mythological epics which also derive and depict a lot about our society, tell us one thing that we as Human beings choose to close our eyes and feel that things don’t exist. Nature isn’t far enough from this depiction where an Ostrich is known to have hidden it’s head under the sand and thinks that it is hiding from a predator. We Human beings follow the same principles. We close our eyes or get easily blind-folded and believe that world is as what we ‘feel’ or are ‘told’ it is.

Lord Dhritrashtra, atleast had a dependable Sanjay who could tell him the truth of what was happening, but in Kalyug, we have become Dhritrashtras and Gandharis who have probably ‘interested’ parties acting like Sanjays and telling us HOAX which we hear for ages and start believing of existence of such HOAX. And soon these beliefs becomes strong facts in our eyes though we continue to remain blind-folded, by choice.

It won’t be wrong to call the “Feminism in India” working like Negative Sanjays who are feeding us with HOAX continuously and unfortunately, we as Gandharis have started believing it.

One such HOAX which is doing rounds on various Social and Electronic Media is the noise around “Marital Rape

With this Article, we wish to bring to you the HOAX which are being spread about Marital Rape in India, obviously by few ‘interested’ parties. 

HOAX 1: India doesn’t have Marital Rape law

HOAX 2: Marital Rape, wife are victims

 

HOAX 1: India doesn’t have Marital Rape law

Coming to HOAX 1, that India doesn’t have Marital Rape Law, let me list down 4 very important Laws / Acts of India. Listing specific relevant portions:

LAW #1: Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005

3. Definition of domestic violence.—

For the purposes of this Act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it—
 (a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well‑being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse; or
(b) harasses, harms, injures …………………; or
(c) has the effect …………………….; or
(d) otherwise injures ………………………..

Explanation I.—For the purposes of this section,—
(i) “physical abuse” means …………………………;
(ii) “sexual abuse” includes any conduct of a sexual nature that abuses, humiliates, degrades or otherwise violates the dignity of woman;

18. Protection orders.—

The Magistrate may, after giving the aggrieved person and the respondent an opportunity of being heard and on being prima facie satisfied that domestic violence has taken place or is likely to take place, pass a protection order in favour of the aggrieved person and prohibit the respondent from—
(a) committing any act of domestic violence;
(b) aiding or abetting in the commission of acts of domestic violence;

31. Penalty for breach of protection order by respondent.—

(1) A breach of protection order, or of an interim protection order, by the respondent shall be an offence under this Act and shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both.
(2) The offence under sub-section ………………..
(3) While framing charges under sub-section (1), the Magistrates may also frame charges under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or any other provision of that Code or the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961), as the case may be, if the facts disclose the commission of an offence under those provisions.
This means that, as per Domestic Violence Act in India:
Ø  ‘any’ sexual conduct is punishable. Yes, ANY.
Ø  Protection order stops the Respondent(s) from committing any act of Domestic Violence, including Sexual Abuse. It also expands to anyone aiding or abetting any act of Domestic Violence. Means, all respondents are liable.
Ø  Breach of Protection Order means jail term of 1 year and also prosecution under section IPC 498A (a penal provision)
Ø  ‘Rape’ in all known and unknown definitions, hence, is a subset of Sexual Abuse.
Ø  AND A KNOWN FACT, ONLY A WOMAN CAN BE A VICTIM UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 OF UNION OF INDIA. MEN CAN NOT BE.
 
LAW #2: Indian Penal Code Section 377

Section 377. Unnatural offences

Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with 1[imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation:
Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section.
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Punishment—Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-Bailable—Triable by Magistrate of the first class—Non-compoundable.

This means that, as per IPC 377 in India:
Ø  ‘any’ ‘against the order of nature’ is punishable. Yes, ANY.
Ø  Imprisonment for 10 years AND fine. Yes, AND.
Ø  Non-Bailable. Yes, only a court can give Bail.
Ø  Since this section explains as ‘Penetration’, by default, men only can be perpetrators.
Ø  Pick the latest formats of Marital issue FIRs across India (yes, most women use one of known formats of their states meaning even allegations are same), IPC 377 is becoming the norm of the day especially post CrPC 41A coming into existence.
 

LAW #3: Indian Penal Code Section 498A
Section 498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty
1[498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.—Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be pun­ished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation
For the purpose of this section, “cruelty” means—
(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or
(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.]
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
Punishment—Imprisonment for 3 years and fine‑Cognizable if information relating to the commission of the offence is given to an officer in charge of a police station by the person aggrieved by the offence or by any person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption or if there is no such relative, by any public serv­ant belonging to such class or category as may be notified by the State Government in this behalf—Non-bailable—Triable by Magis­trate of the first class—Non-compoundable.
This means that, as per IPC 498A in India:
Ø  Harassment can be of ‘any’ type and hence INCLUDES sexual harassment too
Ø  It is a PENAL provision
Ø  Another wrong understanding people have, that IPC 498A is about Dowry

LAW #4: Indian Penal Code Section 376A

Section 376A. Intercourse by a man with his wife during separation

1[376A. Whoever, commits an offence punishable under sub-section (1) or subsection (2) of section 376 and in the course of such commission inflicts an injury which causes the death of the woman or causes the woman to be in a persistent vegetative state, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than twenty years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that person’s natural life, or with death.]
This means that, as per IPC 376A in India:
Ø  Rape of a ‘Wife’ by a Husband is part of IPC 376
Ø  ‘during Separation’ is not defined and hence we see this section being commonly used in FIR formats of various states
 

 

HOAX 2: Marital Rape, Wife are victims
Let me take you to a report which is from the ministry that talks about women (unfortunately, Government dint bother to do any surveys on this).

Ministry of Women and Child Development, in year 2007, published a report named “Study on Child Abuse: India 2007”. If you search this report, on page 74, you would see this:



The screenshot reads (highlighted), “Among them 52.94% were boys and 47.06% girls.” Which means that of every 100 children sexually abused in India, 53 of them were boys and 47 were girls.

The state wise distribution is shown on Page 75, as under:


So, out of 13 major states covered in the survey, 9 states showed more than 50% of sexual abuse was of boys. Maximum unfortunate share of Boy’s sexual abuse was in 65.64% in Delhi while it was Gujarat which showed Girl’s highest % as 63.41%. This means that even in highest percentages, boys sexual abuse was more than 2% girls while in the average, boys sexual abuse was 6% higher than girls.

So, as per the Feminist arm of Government itself, MORE BOYS IN INDIA ARE ABUSED SEXUALLY.

Now, though we can always doubt the veracity of this claim too as Ministry of Women and Child Development has responded via RTI saying “Protection of Men is not Ministry’s mandate”. So it would be safe to assume that a data collection methodology and display by this ministry has to be sided towards women. And hence, this data would have been tweeked in every possible way to be pro-women.

Nevertheless, we still assume that this data is correct and hence, it brings us to a very important fact:
AS PER INDIAN SOCIETY AND LAWS, BOYS, WHO ARE 53% VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ABUSE, BECOME 0% VICTIMS THE DAY THEY BLOW THEIR 18th BIRTHDAY CANDLES.

Because, Indian society and laws doesn’t even assume that men/husbands can be raped.

In various data / surveys, it has always been found that men have been equally big victims for Domestic Violence, Spouse Burning, and even as per above survey, Rape & Sexual Abuse too then Why do we think Husband / Men cannot be raped? Say, even if there is 1 such case, don’t you think that it is unconstitutional for that man to not have law protecting him too?

So, with both the HOAX clarified with reality, I hope you would agree to one fact:

INDIAN HUSBANDS NEED A MARITAL RAPE LAW FOR THEM AS VICTIMS AND SO DOES INDIAN MEN NEED RAPE LAW TO PROTECT THEM.

Thursday, 5 February 2015

Feminism = Misrepresentation

FEMINISM = MISREPRESENTATION

 
As I start writing this blog, I know most of the people reading it would start with disagreement and hence would probably stop reading it or read it with an intent to find faults (when not in logic then in grammar / English) in this write-up.
 
Today, most of the Indian Media, with sheer intent to copy data and misrepresent it to make their Feminist investors happy, published some news. One such news looked like this:
SNAPSHOT WITH HIGHLIGHTING FROM HINDUSTAN TIMES WEBSITE
 This article, deeply smelled of Feminists existing subtle methodologies of effecting the Indian mindset of feeling guilty to be Patriarchal (though Patriarchy is a HOAX for India).
 
The article by Indian media, somewhere have put the blame of findings of such a research on men and their 'mindset'. As per the above article, the writer puts headline as:
 
"By 2050, educated Indian women could have a hard time finding 'suitable' men: Research"
 
Any feminist/humanist Indian, while scanning through this article would read the Headline and assume again that Men are at fault and Men are against educated women etc. etc. And with ongoing 'Beti Padhao, Beti Bachao' advertising, such an Article just uses the Feminist undercurrents for ANOTHER TSUNAMI against Indian Men.
 
Interested to know what made Oxford University so interested in Indian Marriages and more so of Indian Marriages in 2050, I decided to read what exactly has been said / researched.
 
While scanning through Internet, I went on the Oxford University website and found few more details (not the actual research) via News & Updates page as under:
SNAPSHOT FROM OXFORD UNIVERSITY WEBSITE
 
As you can see, the headline on the Oxford website is essentially not Gender specific as it talks about Marriage Partners.
 
Nevertheless, let me come to inferences later.
 
Now, if you see the Oxford University Link, you will read this:
"More than half (54.4%) of the marriages in which the groom went to university involved brides schooled to primary or secondary level. Just over one quarter (26.6%) of women who had completed university ‘married down’, choosing less educated spouses, with most female graduates (73.4%) having husbands of a similar educational background"
 
This means following (using the same terms as given in Oxford link):
  • 54.4% university completed INDIAN Grooms 'married down'
  • Means 45.6% university completed INDIAN Grooms having Brides of a similar educational background
  • 26.6% university completed INDIAN Brides 'married down'
  • 73.4% university completed INDIAN Brides having Grooms of a similar educational background
The simple inference out of above data is:

As against Indian Men, who are 50-50 when it comes to accepting their partner to be More OR Less OR Equal educated as them, only about 25% of Indian Women are accepting their partner to be Less educated then them.

This means that Indian Men (University educated) are MORE OPEN MINDED on education level of their Spouse as against Indian Women (University educated) who, in majority, do NOT want to marry a Husband lesser educated then them.
 
SO THE BIG QUESTION IS: WHO NEEDS TO BE MORE OPEN MINDED? INDIAN MEN OR INDIAN WOMEN?
 
Looking at the reality of India, just ask yourself, "How many girls you know in your circle who are ready to marry someone less educated them or lesser earning them?" AND "How many boys you know in your circle for whom education or salary of the girl is not a matter of make-or-break of marriage?" But still Indian Media chooses to put the blame on Indian Men while deciding the headlines.
 
What could have been appropriate Headline?
 
As per me, it should have been:
"By 2050, educated Indian women could have a hard time accepting men for marriage: Research"
 
Now coming to the reason why this Article is named "FEMINISM = MISREPRESENTATION":
  1. The actual research, as shown above clearly states which Gender is more choosy, still the Lead Writer of the research says reason to be 'Men wanting to marry someone lesser educated then them'. WHY? Indian Origin / Indian writer, India, which is already considered as 'Rape Country' or 'Dowry Country' or 'Anti Women Country' because of Feminist spread hysteria, can only blame Men, ALWAYS.
  2. So under the influence of intravenous Feminism, the writer already makes wrong inferences of her OWN data.
  3. Coming to the India's super influenced media or rather amazingly funded media (by feminism of course, since Men's Rights isn't Money making game globally), MISEREPRESENTS the headline from Oxford research to put FULL BLAME ON INDIAN MEN in the Headline itself while the data from same research says different things.
And before you think of any other inference, lets remove the assumption that Girls in India are FORCED to marry as per Parent's wish while Boys in India get FREE CHOICE. Please read the articles again, we are talking about 'UNIVERSITY EDUCATED' crowd.
 
AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATED CROWD IS NOT FORCED EITHER A BOY OR A GIRL.
 
Hence, I stand by, where I started:

FEMINISM = MISREPRESENTATION

Monday, 2 February 2015

Formats RTI / TEP / Others

NOTE: THESE ARE FORMATS THAT VARIOUS COMMANDOS HAVE USED FOR THEIR OWN CASES. THESE MAY OR MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO YOUR CASE.

 

USE THESE ONLY AS REFERENCE AND DON’T WORK AS COPY-PASTE.

 

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

SIF stands with Family for - JUSTICE FOR AMIT BACHCHAN

WILL AMIT's MURDER ALSO GO AS SUICIDE?

 
Amit Bachchan's family says its a Murder. A murder because, Amit's phone being used post his death time. Because Post Mortem report doesn't say clearly that it's a suicide. Because the cable used for hanging (or show hanging) snapped and fan is undamaged. Because the door or wife was bolted from inside while mother was bolted from outside. Because one kitchen door was open. Because the marriage was only 2 months old.
 
Such facts and Police says its a suicide. Why? Because:> There is no FIR required for Suicide case. So no work needs to be done.
> Police and Post Mortem seem to be managed.
 
So, SIF has come forward to fight with Family of Amit Bachchan (Only Mother and Sister, Brother-In-Law).
 
PLEASE JOIN US FOR PEACEFUL CANDLE PROTEST IN DELHI AT 2:30 PM THIS SATURDAY (31st Jan 2015). VENUE IS POLICE HEADQUARTERS, NEAR ITO.
 
Please speak to following contacts in case you are not able find the place.
Wasif Ali (9818509406), Vitesh (9958987919), Ritwik Bisaria (9910074914), Amit Lakhani (9811004578)
 
A WOMEN DIES AND IT IS DOWRY DEATH AND HUSBAND's MURDER IS CONVERTED TO SUICIDE? FEMINISTS WOULD COME ON ROADS FOR A SUICIDAL BRIDE AND WOULD WE COME ON ROADS FOR A INNOCENT HUSBAND's MURDER?